Sand og ösku fok

Þann 14. maí 2013 var nokkuð sand og ösku fok af suðurlandi, enda sólríkt og vindasamt. Til dæmis í Þykkvabæ, þar sem vindhraði var um 15 m/s rétt fyrir hádegi í dag.

Gervitunglamyndir frá 11:50, 12:10, 13:30 og 13:45 sýna hvernig sandur og væntanlega enn einhver aska fauk á haf út í norðanátt.

11:50

12:10

13:30

13:45

Mikið af ögnum í lofti þann 14. apríl 2013

Hár styrkur PM10 mældist í Reykjavík og í Fljótshverfi fyrir austan sunnudaginn 14. apríl 2013.

Fyrst Reykjavík, 24-klst meðaltalið var um 89.4 µg/m3 (heilsuverndarmörkin eru 50 µg/m3). Vindhraði í borginni var ekkert sérlega mikill (4-5 m/s), en mun meiri víða nærri.

Í Fljótshverfi voru mjög há gildi mæld í gær !

Graf fengið af vef ust.is

Staðsetning mælisins í Fljótshverfi er sýnd á kortinu hér að neða (græna merkið sunnan vestasta hluta Vatnajökuls).

Á gervitunglamyndum sést greinilega að heilmikið af sandi og ösku var að fjúka. Hér að neðan er mynd frá því kl. 13:15 (14. apríl 2013). Fljótshverfi var að hluta til hulið skýjum, en neðri myndin sýnir það svæði.

Fljótshverfi og nágrenni 14. apríl 2013.

Sand og öskufok þann 18. mars 2013

Image from NASA MODIS/Rapidfire.

Í Fljótshverfi, fyrir austan, hefur PM10 verið ansi hátt annað slagið vegna sterkra vinda og þurrviðris.

Mikið svifryk er einnig í Reykjavík, sum til komið í óveðrinu um daginn sem flutti mikið af ösku yfir borgina, sem situr enn víða. Einnig á umferð sinn þátt í svifrykinu, eins og gögn frá Grensás sýna (PM10).

Sand- og öskufok af suðurlandi

Í dag, 17. mars 2013, er töluvert sand- og öskufok af suðurlandi.

Svartar tölur eru vindhraði í metrum á sekúndu (blár hitastig í °C). Mynd frá Veðurstofu Íslands.

Svifryk yfir mörkum 4. mars 2013

Stykur svifryksmengunar, PM₁₀, mældist mest 372 µg/m³ kl. 20:00 þann 4. mars 2013. Sólarhringsmeðaltalið er um 80 µg/m³, sem er hærra en sett heisluverndarmörk 50 µg/m³.

Í gær voru einnig sandstormar í þurri norðanáttinni. Gervitunglamyndir sýna skemmtilega þróun frá 11:25 til 13:40 (images courtesy of NASA/Rapidfire and IMO).

Heilsufarsáhrif eldgosssins í Eyjafjallajökli 2010

Ný grein í BMJ Open - frír aðgangur að pdf.

BMJ Open 2012;2:e001851 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001851

• Public health

Health effects following the Eyjafjallajökull volcanic eruption: a cohort study

1. Hanne Krage Carlsen1,2, 
2. Arna Hauksdottir1, 
3. Unnur Anna Valdimarsdottir1,
4. Thorarinn Gíslason3, 
5. Gunnlaug Einarsdottir4, 
6. Halldor Runolfsson5, 
7. Haraldur Briem6,
8. Ragnhildur Gudrun Finnbjornsdottir1, 
9. Sigurdur Gudmundsson7, 
10. Thorir Björn Kolbeinsson8,
11. Throstur Thorsteinsson9, 
12. Gudrun Pétursdóttir10

Abstract

Objectives The study aimed to determine whether exposure to a volcanic eruption was associated with increased prevalence of physical and/or mental symptoms.

Design Cohort, with non-exposed control group.

Setting Natural disasters like volcanic eruptions constitute a major public-health threat. The Icelandic volcano Eyjafjallajökull exposed residents in southern Iceland to continuous ash fall for more than 5 weeks in spring 2010. This study was conducted during November 2010–March 2011, 6–9 months after the Eyjafjallajökull eruption.

Participants Adult (18–80 years of age) eruption-exposed South Icelanders (N=1148) and a control population of residents of Skagafjörður, North Iceland (N=510). The participation rate was 72%.

Main outcome measures Physical symptoms in the previous year (chronic), in the previous month (recent), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) measured psychological morbidity.

Results The likelihood of having symptoms during the last month was higher in the exposed population, such as; tightness in the chest (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.1 to 5.8), cough (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.7 to 3.9), phlegm (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.3 to 3.2), eye irritation (OR 2.9; 95% CI 2.0 to 4.1) and psychological morbidity symptoms (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0 to 1.7). Respiratory symptoms during the last 12 months were also more common in the exposed population; cough (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.6 to 2.9), dyspnoea (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.3), although the prevalence of underlying asthma and heart disease was similar. Twice as many in the exposed population had two or more symptoms from nose, eyes or upper-respiratory tract (24% vs 13%, p<0.001); these individuals were also more likely to experience psychological morbidity (OR 4.7; 95% CI 3.4 to 6.5) compared with individuals with no symptoms. Most symptoms exhibited a dose–response pattern within the exposed population, corresponding to low, medium and high exposure to the eruption.

Conclusions 6–9 months after the Eyjafjallajökull eruption, residents living in the exposed area, particularly those closest to the volcano, had markedly increased prevalence of various physical symptoms. A portion of the exposed population reported multiple symptoms and may be at risk for long-term physical and psychological morbidity. Studies of long-term consequences are therefore warranted.

Figure 2. Venn diagram of exposed and non-exposed participants reporting one or more key symptom 6–9 months after the Eyjafjallajökull eruption. Eye symptoms: irritation, itch or other discomfort; nasal symptoms: sneeze or runny nose without having a cough; cough and/or phlegm: often cough without having a cold and/or phlegm during winter. The numbers do not add up due to rounding.

Fyrstu heilsufarseinkenni vegna eldgossins í Eyjafjallajökli 2010

Ný grein í BMJ Open - opinn aðgangur að pdf.

BMJ Open 2012;2:e000343 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000343

• Public health

A survey of early health effects of the Eyjafjallajökull 2010 eruption in Iceland: a population-based study

1. Hanne Krage Carlsen1, 
2. Thorarinn Gislason2,3, 
3. Bryndis Benediktsdottir2,3,
4. Thorir Bjorn Kolbeinsson4, 
5. Arna Hauksdottir1, 
6. Throstur Thorsteinsson5, 
7. Haraldur Briem6

Abstract

Objective To estimate physical and mental health effects of the Eyjafjallajökull volcanic eruption on nearby residents.

Design Cross-sectional study.

Setting The Icelandic volcano Eyjafjallajökull erupted on 14 April 2010. The eruption lasted for about 6 weeks and was explosive, ejecting some 8 million tons of fine particles into the atmosphere. Due to prevailing winds, the ash spread mostly to the south and south-east, first over the rural region to the south, later over the Atlantic Ocean and Europe, closing European air space for several days.

Participants Residents (n=207) of the most ash-exposed rural area south and east of the volcano.

Methods The study period was from 31 May to 11 June 2010. Participants were examined by a physician. To ascertain respiratory health, standardised spirometry was performed before and after the use of a bronchodilator. All adult participants answered questionnaires about mental and physical health, their children's health and the use of protective equipment.

Results Every other adult participant reported irritation in eyes and upper airway when exposed to volcanic ash. Adults (n=26) and children (n=5) with pre-existing asthma frequently reported worsening of their symptoms. No serious health problems requiring hospitalisation could be attributed to the eruption. The majority of the participants reported no abnormal physical or mental symptoms to the examining physician. Compared to an age- and gender-matched reference group, the ash-exposed participants reported lower smoking rates and were less likely to have ventilation impairment. Less than 10% of the participants reported symptoms of stress, anxiety or depression.

Conclusions Short-term ash exposure was associated with upper airway irritation symptoms and exacerbation of pre-existing asthma but did not contribute to serious health problems. The exposure did not impair respiratory function compared to controls. Outdoor use of protective glasses and face masks was considered protective against irritation in eyes and upper airway.